Top 10 Cross Platform Mobile App Development Tools

22 November 2017
Top 10 Cross Platform Mobile App Development Tools
Top 10 Cross Platform Tools
Posted by Root Info Solutions

Considering to get your idea coded to success? Well, everyone wants it, but few only truly succeed in as we discussed in one of our previous blogs titled 17 Things That Users Expect From Every Mobile App in the very beginning.

While there could be a sea of factors that hold the key to success of an app strategy, a significant one that rarely gets the attention of entrepreneurs today is the type of app development tool to use.  The diversity and quality of its plugin libraries and APIs, and other compatibility and integration aspects play a big role in that.

With the platform and device diversity reining the mobile landscape, cross-platform app development has emerged as a commercially viable option. Contrary to native app development, a single code composition created with a cross-platform development tool can be used to target multiple platforms or devices. Hence, it helps you not just containing the cost of technology investment, but also the hassles involved with updating and managing the portfolio of apps in your business.

Based on our 14+ years of mobile app development experience, we have consolidated a list of top 10 cross-platform mobile app development tools for you.

1. PhoneGap (Apache Cordova)

Phonegap

Engineered by the team behind Apache Cordova, this open source tool comprises of compiler, debugger and testing tools weaved with popular web technologies (HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript). The myth that PhoneGap is suitable for building only simple apps, and that PhoneGap apps make little use of device?s capabilities have been debunked in the recent past with the inclusion of a wide range of plugins like Image Capture plugin, Media Recorder Plugin, Push plugin, and much more.  For instance, CP Jobsite app, a PhoneGap-based app enables supervisors of a painting services provider to stay connected with their dispersed workforces. Users at the other end can capture the progress of the work via the device?s camera, and send it over to their supervisors. Instant messaging allows them to share updates frequently.

Pros

  • Web technologies (HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript) are at the core of PhoneGap. Hence, developers can make use of their existing skills.
  • Code reusability across iOS, Android, Windows Phone, BlackBerry, Firefox OS enables developers and businesses to reduce the TTM (Time-to-Market)
  • It possesses a plugin-able architecture that helps developers create featured-apps with the utilization of device?s capabilities through APIs.
  • It supports in-app purchases across App Store for iOS, the Google Play Store for Android and more.

Cons

Performance issues might occur with graphic-intensive apps. Implementing 3rd party solutions to enhance caching and graphic acceleration developers can overcome this challenge. However, with OEMs coming up with better technology specifications, you should worry a little on this front.

You will like reading this: Apache Cordova App Development: Guidelines for Beginners

2. Appcelerator

Appcelerator

Cross-platform developers can use the tool to build, test, connect and, eventually, measure the functionality of the built app. It favors JavaScript programming. The universal code concept applies here. Developers can implement one code base across multiple platforms from Android and iOS to Windows Phone and BlackBerry to speed up product development and delivery.

Pros

  • It?s suitable for rapid application development. Developers can build a prototype of the app in a quick and easy way to evaluate the user interaction with UI.
  • It possesses a schema-less data store called ArrowDB that lets you deploy data models with zero setup efforts
  • It facilitates seamless integration to existing continuous delivery systems like SCM and MDM solutions
  • It?s equipped with pre-built connectors available for MS Azure, MS SQL, Salesforce, MongoDB, Box and various others

Cons

Appcelerator is known to be a bit buggy and laggy, though the newer version is more stable. There are also user complaints of poor support from its developer's community

3. Xamarin

Xamarin

In Xamarin, a C# codebase can be universally applied to multiple platforms. However, unlike other frameworks, it lets developers work with native IDEs, languages, and APIS. Moreover, Git integration is built directly into the Xamarin Studio.

Pros

  • Xamarin comes up with some sample apps to help you get started in a quick and easy manner.
  • Almost three-fourth of the code can be shared across major mobile platforms. Hence, using Xamarin, you can curtail not just the development cost but also the TTM (time-to-market).
  • Xamarin supports functionality testing and quality monitoring across a wide range of devices. It does have its Android emulator).

Cons

Prevailing compatibility issues with open-source libraries for Android and iOS are a bit deterrent towards building a full-fledged app. This is something that its community must address to encourage the development of the substantial project with Xamarin.

You will like reading this: 5 Things to Consider While Outsourcing Cross-Platform App Development Project

4. Sencha Ext JS

Sencha Ext JS

If you have been looking for creating data-intensive cross-platform apps or apps that can leverage hardware acceleration techniques, this is the ideal framework to go for. It houses a robust data package (to support interaction with an array of back-end data sources) and 115+ high-performance, pre-tested and integrated UI components including calendar, grids, charts and more. The framework unleashes the potential of HTML5 on modern browsers.

Introducing Sencha Pivot Grid and D3 adapter, Sencha Ext JS enables developers to build apps with great business intelligence (BI) for data visualization and analytics. Ext JS Grid and Advanced Charting package analyze and interpret millions of records with ease.

Pros

  • It features built-in native-looking themes for every major platform
  • It supports Android, iOS, BlackBerry, Windows Phone and more
  • Its backend data package works independently with different data sources
  • It supports PhoneGap/Cordova integration for native API access and packaging

Cons

  • Little choices regarding choosing the themes for the target platforms.
  • Licensing complexity with the commercial version.

5. MonoCross

MonoCross

MonoCross supports the development of cross-platform apps with C#, Microsoft .NET and the Mono framework. Developers can retain the coding of application, controller, and model across different platforms while playing with the platform container and the view, that is, user-interface, to deliver a native experience across all key platforms. Also, it makes app porting easier than ever. Thus, businesses can cope with the rapid changes in platforms.

Pros

  • Supporting a diverse range of APIs, MonoCross makes it easier to utilize the complete capability of the device.
  • Support to third-party APIs also reduces the development time as developers don?t have to struggle with the low-level intricacies of every platform
  • Using MonoCross to develop apps requires only C# and .NET compatibility

Cons

Cross-Platform developers, particularly, the beginner, struggle with its usability and features as little documentation and support resources are available online.

6. Adobe Build

Adobe Build

This cloud-based tool works along with Cordova or PhoneGap and does the code compilation part, thereby, helping the developers to pursue their goals and expedite the delivery as well as the quality of deliverables. Instead of getting acquainted with multiple native software development kits like Android SDK, iOS SDK, Windows Phone SDK or something similar, developers can work on any cross-platform app development project - all that is required is the knowledge of web technologies or languages like  CSS3, HTML5, and Java.

Pros

  • Code reusability helps developers to cope with the tighter deadlines.
  • Access to native APIs (such as camera, geolocation, and contacts) made simpler with a few line of JavaScript
  • Businesses and enterprises with their strict TTM (time-to-market) and growing competition.
  • It helps with managing a portfolio of apps with quick updates and maintenance.

Cons

  • Data processing speed with JavaScript is not as efficient as it?s with a native language, like Swift.
  • Slow background processing as APIs with JavaScript is not multi-threaded
  • Poor access to native functionality. Many of the native APIs lack support for PhoneGap?s APIs.

7. Kony AppPlatform

Kony AppPlatform

A low-code app development framework, Kony AppPlatform is the favorite choice of enterprises who want to cope with their growing demand for mobile applications. Developers with skills in JavaScript can make use of this platform to create native as well as cross-platform apps. It?s the greatest benefit is that developers can drag-and-drop features they need from the Kony Marketplace or their API libraries. Developers can review the app and cross-check its API connectivity. Thus, the framework accelerates the development process.

Pros

  • Kony is loaded with sample or pre-built apps to educate developers
  • It supports a wide range of backend systems
  • It has a strong visualizer to validate its powerful multi-channel JavaScript APIs

Cons

The documentation and support available for Kony on the web is not sufficient, same as Motocross when compared to that of various other platforms, which has restricted its adoption by beginners.

You will like reading this: Top 5 Benefits of Apache Cordova/PhoneGap App Development

8. Convertigo

Convertigo

Convertigo pitches itself as a mobile backend as a service (MBaaS) platform and offers products like Convertigo Studio, Convertigo Server, Convertigo Cloud and Convertigo Mobilizer that ease app development for enterprises.

Pros

  • Convertigo features Fullsync data replication technology that helps with building apps with offline mode.
  • It favors connectivity with dispersed enterprise data with connectors such as SQL databases or web services
  • It supports Cordova plugins and can make use of device?s features like GPS, camera, sensors, etc.
  • Its push notifications work in standby mode

Cons

Convertigo has three different plans of which the free plan just has community support and doesn?t include its Fullsync offline data support.

9. Nativescript

Nativescript

This open-source platform favors building cross-platform apps with native UI for Android and iOS using Angular, TypeScript or JavaScript. Developers can access native APIs via JavaScript and reuse of packages from NPM, CocoaPods, and Gradle. Thus, creating a feature-rich app or enhancing the existing features becomes easier.

Pros

  • It extends support to Angular.js 2 and TypeScript
  • It lets you use almost any JavaScript library that does not rely on the Internet
  • Built apps make use of native components and have direct access to the native APIs along with full access to the development libraries
  • It possesses a cross-platform Declarative UI support, allowing you to make the app?s UI once and implement it across different platforms

Cons

Multi-threading is a possible issue in the Native script that may be improved in later releases. There is a lack of in-depth examples and documentation on each of its feature.

10. RhoMobile Suite

RhoMobile Suite

Powered by Rhodes open source framework, RhoMobile Suite is a set of development tools required to build data-centric, cross-platform enterprise apps with the native user experience. It has its anatomy quite similar to PhoneGap. Its existing web technologies like CSS3, HTML5, JavaScript are joined by Ruby. Apps based on RhoMobile Suite can be made compatible with mobile as well as non-mobile operating systems like iOS, Android, Windows Phone, Windows Mobile, Windows CE, Windows 10 Mobile and Windows Desktop.

Pros

  • Its automatic data encryption helps enterprise worried with BYOD to secure their enterprise data
  • Its Object Relational Mapper enables automatic synchronization of the backend data
  • It supports offline data accessibility and  synchronization into apps

Cons

It restricts Radio-frequency identification (RFID) plug-ins to Windows Mobile/CE. Had it been made open source, it could have reached farther regarding popularity.

Conclusion

The numbering doesn?t reflect the superiority or inferiority of a particular framework. Every tool has its strength and limitation and, hence, the selection of framework should be done as per the requirements of a project. A cross-platform app development company entrusted with any project must strike a balance between what is available and what is required, and go in the right direction.

cross platform app development